Results of SurveyUSA Election Poll #20847 |
In San Diego Mayoral Special Election, Faulconer Zooms Ahead of Fletcher; Faulconer Would Now Defeat Fletcher If There is a Runoff:
Backed by 69% of Republicans, 65% of conservatives and 47% of seniors, Kevin Faulconer turns the mayor's race upside down in San Diego, leaping today ahead of former-front-runner Nathan Fletcher, 41% to 28%. 6 weeks ago, when SurveyUSA first polled the contest for the Union Tribune newspaper and KGTV-TV 10 News, Fletcher led by 8 points. 3 weeks ago, SurveyUSA found Fletcher leading by 4. Today, Fletcher trails by 13, a 17-point poll-on-poll swing to Faulconer. Over the past 6 weeks: Faulconer's support has doubled among women, moderates and Independents. His support among Hispanics has nearly tripled. Among the wealthiest voters, Faulconer had trailed Fletcher by 8, now leads by 11, a 19-point swing. Among voters who are keen to elect a fiscally responsible mayor, Faulconer now leads Fletcher 4:1. Faulconer also benefits from early voting, where he has already "banked" 48% of the ballots returned: among those voters who tell SurveyUSA they have already voted, Faulconer leads by 19 points. David Alvarez gets 17% of votes today, Mike Aguirre gets 7%, and another 7% are voting for some other candidate, or are undecided. If support for these 2nd-tier candidates collapses as Election Day nears, if Fletcher cannot find new traction, and if Faulconer's trajectory continues, it is conceivable that Faulconer could reach the 50% + 1 vote that is needed to avoid a runoff. Still, a runoff is likely. In a runoff today between Fletcher and Faulconer, Faulconer defeats Fletcher 46% to 41%. 6 weeks ago, Fletcher had led by 14 points, now trails by 5, a swing of 19 points towards Faulconer. In the head-to-head match-up, Faulconer's entire margin of victory comes from men, where Faulconer leads by 9. Among women, the 2 candidates are effective even, though once, Fletcher led women by 19. Cell-phone and home-phone respondents are included in this research. SurveyUSA interviewed 700 city of San Diego adults 10/28/13 through 10/31/13. Of the adults, 600 were registered to vote. Of the registered voters, 550 were determined by SurveyUSA to be likely to return a ballot on or before Election Day. This research was conducted using blended sample, mixed mode. Voters reachable on a landline telephone (85% of likely voters) were interviewed on their landline phone in the voice of a professional announcer. Voters not reachable on a landline telephone (15% of likely voters) were shown a questionnaire on their smartphone, tablet or other electronic device. |
![]() | If the special election for San Diego mayor were today, who would you vote for? (candidate names rotated) |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Nathan Fletcher | 28% | 28% | 29% | 33% | 29% | 27% | 22% | 31% | 25% | 31% | 27% | 27% | 22% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 42% | 27% | 15% | 33% | 37% | 29% | 27% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 31% | 24% | 30% | 31% | 24% | 34% | 16% | 53% |
Mike Aguirre | 7% | 6% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 6% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 5% | 14% | 8% | 9% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 6% | 8% | 9% | 3% | 11% | 7% | 8% | 6% | 12% | 8% | 6% | 10% | 8% | 5% | 8% | 5% | 13% | 3% |
Kevin Faulconer | 41% | 42% | 40% | 36% | 40% | 41% | 47% | 38% | 44% | 45% | 26% | 34% | 42% | 33% | 42% | 69% | 18% | 39% | 65% | 38% | 15% | 48% | 39% | 38% | 39% | 44% | 39% | 32% | 41% | 42% | 45% | 35% | 57% | 19% |
David Alvarez | 17% | 16% | 18% | 17% | 14% | 20% | 19% | 15% | 20% | 16% | 17% | 27% | 11% | 16% | 17% | 6% | 29% | 15% | 6% | 17% | 33% | 15% | 18% | 18% | 22% | 15% | 18% | 21% | 16% | 17% | 17% | 19% | 9% | 18% |
Other | 3% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 11% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 6% | 2% | 3% | 1% | 0% | 4% | 3% | 0% | 5% | 2% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 5% |
Undecided | 4% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 5% | 3% | 2% | 4% | 4% | 11% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 6% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 1% | 4% | 6% | 2% | 5% | 4% | 8% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 6% | 3% | 3% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Fletcher | 54% | 52% | 55% | 53% | 58% | 55% | 46% | 55% | 51% | 59% | 38% | 49% | 48% | 67% | 51% | 44% | 60% | 57% | 40% | 60% | 59% | 50% | 55% | 55% | 46% | 47% | 58% | 41% | 58% | 59% | 49% | 66% | 41% | 71% |
Aguirre | 27% | 29% | 25% | 29% | 25% | 24% | 31% | 27% | 27% | 22% | 43% | 37% | 26% | 23% | 28% | 30% | 28% | 21% | 34% | 23% | 26% | 26% | 29% | 26% | 36% | 31% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 24% | 28% | 22% | 37% | 12% |
Undecided | 19% | 19% | 20% | 18% | 18% | 21% | 23% | 18% | 22% | 19% | 19% | 14% | 26% | 10% | 21% | 26% | 12% | 22% | 26% | 16% | 15% | 24% | 16% | 19% | 18% | 22% | 18% | 24% | 17% | 17% | 23% | 12% | 23% | 18% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |
![]() | What if the only candidates were Nathan Fletcher and Kevin Faulconer? |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Fletcher | 41% | 39% | 43% | 46% | 42% | 40% | 35% | 44% | 38% | 42% | 42% | 45% | 35% | 53% | 39% | 23% | 58% | 40% | 22% | 47% | 55% | 36% | 44% | 42% | 38% | 34% | 46% | 39% | 47% | 42% | 37% | 50% | 25% | 62% |
Faulconer | 46% | 48% | 44% | 42% | 48% | 44% | 52% | 45% | 48% | 48% | 35% | 44% | 49% | 40% | 47% | 68% | 29% | 43% | 66% | 43% | 27% | 53% | 43% | 45% | 51% | 54% | 41% | 44% | 44% | 46% | 51% | 40% | 61% | 22% |
Undecided | 12% | 13% | 12% | 12% | 11% | 15% | 12% | 11% | 14% | 11% | 23% | 11% | 16% | 7% | 13% | 9% | 13% | 18% | 12% | 10% | 17% | 11% | 13% | 13% | 11% | 12% | 13% | 17% | 10% | 12% | 12% | 10% | 14% | 16% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |
![]() | OK, what if the only candidates were Nathan Fletcher and David Alvarez? |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Fletcher | 51% | 50% | 52% | 59% | 53% | 46% | 42% | 56% | 44% | 54% | 38% | 44% | 55% | 74% | 47% | 47% | 52% | 56% | 48% | 55% | 50% | 51% | 52% | 50% | 41% | 46% | 55% | 46% | 54% | 54% | 45% | 61% | 45% | 60% |
Alvarez | 31% | 31% | 32% | 29% | 30% | 33% | 36% | 29% | 34% | 29% | 37% | 45% | 21% | 19% | 33% | 22% | 43% | 25% | 21% | 31% | 44% | 30% | 32% | 32% | 41% | 33% | 29% | 35% | 30% | 31% | 35% | 29% | 27% | 30% |
Undecided | 18% | 19% | 16% | 12% | 17% | 21% | 22% | 15% | 21% | 17% | 25% | 10% | 25% | 6% | 20% | 31% | 5% | 19% | 31% | 14% | 6% | 19% | 16% | 18% | 18% | 21% | 16% | 19% | 16% | 15% | 20% | 11% | 27% | 10% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |
![]() | OK, what if the only two candidates in the runoff were Mike Aguirre and Kevin Faulconer? |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.2 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Aguirre | 25% | 27% | 23% | 32% | 22% | 24% | 21% | 27% | 23% | 22% | 37% | 30% | 23% | 30% | 24% | 17% | 33% | 25% | 22% | 23% | 34% | 19% | 28% | 26% | 24% | 22% | 26% | 26% | 30% | 21% | 24% | 24% | 25% | 32% |
Faulconer | 59% | 58% | 59% | 52% | 59% | 61% | 64% | 56% | 62% | 62% | 39% | 59% | 54% | 54% | 59% | 74% | 44% | 59% | 69% | 62% | 38% | 68% | 56% | 55% | 60% | 61% | 57% | 52% | 57% | 62% | 62% | 61% | 62% | 48% |
Undecided | 16% | 15% | 18% | 16% | 19% | 15% | 15% | 18% | 15% | 15% | 24% | 12% | 23% | 16% | 17% | 9% | 23% | 16% | 10% | 14% | 28% | 13% | 16% | 19% | 16% | 17% | 17% | 22% | 13% | 17% | 15% | 15% | 13% | 20% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |
![]() | OK, what if the only candidates were Mike Aguirre and David Alvarez? |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Aguirre | 31% | 35% | 28% | 35% | 34% | 27% | 27% | 34% | 27% | 28% | 40% | 35% | 34% | 39% | 30% | 36% | 30% | 27% | 38% | 32% | 23% | 30% | 35% | 29% | 35% | 37% | 28% | 35% | 39% | 24% | 37% | 22% | 43% | 22% |
Alvarez | 43% | 41% | 44% | 36% | 41% | 48% | 48% | 39% | 48% | 44% | 31% | 53% | 29% | 40% | 43% | 27% | 54% | 45% | 25% | 44% | 62% | 45% | 41% | 42% | 40% | 35% | 47% | 36% | 39% | 50% | 38% | 55% | 27% | 50% |
Undecided | 26% | 24% | 28% | 30% | 25% | 24% | 25% | 27% | 25% | 28% | 29% | 12% | 37% | 22% | 27% | 36% | 16% | 28% | 37% | 24% | 15% | 25% | 24% | 29% | 25% | 28% | 25% | 29% | 22% | 25% | 25% | 23% | 31% | 28% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |
![]() | And what if it were Kevin Faulconer and David Alvarez? |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Faulconer | 52% | 52% | 52% | 46% | 56% | 52% | 55% | 51% | 54% | 56% | 38% | 41% | 57% | 43% | 54% | 74% | 32% | 56% | 76% | 49% | 28% | 61% | 53% | 46% | 58% | 50% | 52% | 45% | 53% | 53% | 57% | 46% | 67% | 36% |
Alvarez | 36% | 35% | 36% | 42% | 30% | 34% | 35% | 36% | 35% | 32% | 42% | 55% | 21% | 42% | 34% | 19% | 53% | 28% | 14% | 39% | 57% | 33% | 33% | 39% | 33% | 35% | 37% | 35% | 40% | 35% | 33% | 42% | 20% | 52% |
Undecided | 12% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 14% | 13% | 9% | 13% | 11% | 11% | 20% | 4% | 22% | 15% | 12% | 6% | 15% | 16% | 10% | 11% | 15% | 6% | 13% | 15% | 9% | 15% | 12% | 20% | 8% | 12% | 9% | 12% | 13% | 12% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |
550 Likely & Actual Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Voted | Education | Income | Most Important | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | Already | Likely E | Likely D | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | |
Integrity | 33% | 31% | 36% | 34% | 23% | 39% | 42% | 28% | 40% | 32% | 30% | 32% | 39% | 26% | 34% | 39% | 30% | 30% | 32% | 35% | 32% | 32% | 37% | 31% | 37% | 38% | 31% | 32% | 37% | 31% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Leadership | 24% | 24% | 23% | 29% | 20% | 21% | 23% | 25% | 22% | 24% | 29% | 20% | 24% | 36% | 21% | 19% | 29% | 20% | 19% | 25% | 27% | 26% | 23% | 23% | 21% | 21% | 25% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Stability | 4% | 5% | 3% | 7% | 4% | 2% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 4% | 3% | 7% | 2% | 6% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 6% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 3% | 5% | 4% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 5% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Business Experience | 4% | 5% | 2% | 5% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 5% | 0% | 3% | 2% | 7% | 3% | 5% | 1% | 7% | 4% | 4% | 1% | 5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 5% | 0% | 3% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Fiscal Responsibility | 19% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 33% | 18% | 11% | 22% | 14% | 18% | 20% | 21% | 17% | 14% | 19% | 24% | 13% | 20% | 30% | 16% | 10% | 18% | 12% | 23% | 10% | 13% | 22% | 16% | 13% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Reach Across Party Lines | 11% | 9% | 13% | 8% | 11% | 13% | 13% | 10% | 13% | 12% | 8% | 9% | 12% | 8% | 11% | 4% | 16% | 13% | 3% | 11% | 18% | 11% | 15% | 8% | 11% | 14% | 9% | 11% | 12% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Something Else | 5% | 6% | 4% | 7% | 4% | 4% | 3% | 6% | 4% | 4% | 9% | 6% | 4% | 2% | 5% | 6% | 5% | 2% | 6% | 4% | 5% | 4% | 4% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 4% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Not Sure | 2% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 4% | 2% | 1% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely & Actual Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 30% | 23% | 19% | 58% | 42% | 57% | 7% | 19% | 17% | 15% | 85% | 36% | 42% | 22% | 28% | 47% | 23% | 25% | 31% | 44% | 9% | 28% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 45% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 11% |