Results of SurveyUSA Election Poll #20768 |
Fletcher Emerges as Clear Front Runner in San Diego Special Election to Erase Filner Stain:
One month till early voting begins in the special election to replace Bob Filner as Mayor of San Diego, Nathan Fletcher emerges with a strong coalition that puts him atop Kevin Faulconer, who finishes 2nd today, and David Alvarez, who finishes 3rd. Fletcher gets 30% of the votes in a crowded field, with broad support from middle-aged voters, Democrats, whites and Asians. Fletcher's coalition includes the most educated and the most affluent. Voters focused on Leadership and Reaching Across Party Aisle pick Fletcher. Faulconer gets 22% today, backed by Republicans, conservatives, men and seniors. Voters focused on integrity in government pick Faulconer. David Alvarez gets 17% today. He is backed by Hispanics, young voters, liberals and those with the least formal education. If no one candidate receives 50% of the votes in the 11/19/13 special election, a runoff will follow. In head-to-head matchups for the hypothetical runoff, SurveyUSA finds:
* Fletcher defeats Faulconer 44% to 30%. |
![]() | If the special election for San Diego mayor were today, who would you vote for? (candidate names rotated) |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.4 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Nathan Fletcher | 30% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 34% | 41% | 27% | 25% | 35% | 31% | 25% | 23% | 48% | 20% | 32% | 24% | 38% | 19% | 40% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 16% | 44% | 25% | 23% | 24% | 35% | 27% | 28% | 34% |
Mike Aguirre | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 11% | 12% | 5% | 6% | 10% | 9% | 11% | 4% | 11% | 9% | 8% | 8% | 12% | 7% | 8% | 12% | 11% | 13% | 7% | 16% | 7% | 8% |
Kevin Faulconer | 22% | 26% | 18% | 10% | 24% | 25% | 31% | 17% | 28% | 28% | 10% | 13% | 23% | 18% | 23% | 32% | 14% | 31% | 9% | 51% | 10% | 18% | 48% | 17% | 10% | 12% | 22% | 25% | 20% | 21% | 26% |
David Alvarez | 17% | 17% | 17% | 43% | 7% | 7% | 13% | 24% | 10% | 9% | 16% | 42% | 5% | 28% | 15% | 14% | 30% | 10% | 18% | 3% | 24% | 19% | 10% | 11% | 30% | 31% | 21% | 10% | 7% | 24% | 15% |
Bruce Coons | 2% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 1% | 4% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 0% | 4% |
Other | 4% | 6% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 5% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 2% | 3% | 7% | 10% | 0% | 5% | 2% | 4% | 0% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 9% | 6% | 2% | 7% | 5% | 2% | 6% | 5% | 7% | 1% |
Undecided | 15% | 8% | 22% | 16% | 21% | 8% | 14% | 19% | 11% | 16% | 32% | 9% | 9% | 24% | 13% | 15% | 7% | 27% | 17% | 13% | 19% | 10% | 13% | 15% | 14% | 16% | 16% | 14% | 23% | 14% | 12% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Fletcher | 53% | 58% | 47% | 46% | 60% | 56% | 47% | 53% | 52% | 56% | 37% | 45% | 66% | 58% | 51% | 49% | 66% | 46% | 49% | 49% | 53% | 54% | 44% | 62% | 52% | 40% | 53% | 56% | 43% | 57% | 57% |
Aguirre | 23% | 23% | 24% | 23% | 20% | 23% | 28% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 25% | 22% | 20% | 25% | 23% | 31% | 13% | 21% | 23% | 21% | 23% | 26% | 27% | 18% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 23% | 33% | 21% | 21% |
Undecided | 24% | 19% | 29% | 31% | 20% | 21% | 24% | 25% | 23% | 20% | 39% | 33% | 14% | 17% | 26% | 20% | 21% | 32% | 28% | 29% | 24% | 19% | 29% | 21% | 19% | 21% | 26% | 21% | 24% | 22% | 22% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |
![]() | What if the only candidates were Nathan Fletcher and Kevin Faulconer? |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.4 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Fletcher | 44% | 45% | 43% | 39% | 47% | 50% | 39% | 43% | 45% | 45% | 34% | 44% | 48% | 57% | 41% | 37% | 53% | 35% | 56% | 29% | 50% | 46% | 19% | 53% | 60% | 35% | 44% | 47% | 37% | 48% | 47% |
Faulconer | 30% | 36% | 24% | 23% | 28% | 29% | 42% | 26% | 35% | 37% | 23% | 16% | 29% | 22% | 32% | 40% | 23% | 35% | 16% | 53% | 18% | 30% | 55% | 26% | 12% | 43% | 28% | 30% | 29% | 29% | 33% |
Undecided | 26% | 19% | 32% | 38% | 25% | 21% | 19% | 31% | 20% | 18% | 43% | 40% | 23% | 21% | 27% | 23% | 24% | 30% | 28% | 18% | 32% | 24% | 26% | 20% | 28% | 22% | 27% | 23% | 34% | 22% | 20% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |
![]() | OK, what if the only candidates were Nathan Fletcher and David Alvarez? |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.3 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Fletcher | 52% | 60% | 45% | 47% | 62% | 54% | 44% | 55% | 50% | 59% | 44% | 34% | 65% | 62% | 50% | 49% | 59% | 48% | 54% | 53% | 50% | 55% | 47% | 59% | 50% | 42% | 52% | 56% | 44% | 50% | 63% |
Alvarez | 24% | 24% | 24% | 36% | 16% | 18% | 29% | 25% | 23% | 18% | 17% | 46% | 12% | 22% | 24% | 27% | 30% | 14% | 25% | 16% | 28% | 26% | 20% | 19% | 31% | 41% | 25% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 21% |
Undecided | 24% | 17% | 31% | 18% | 22% | 28% | 27% | 20% | 28% | 24% | 38% | 20% | 22% | 16% | 26% | 23% | 10% | 38% | 21% | 31% | 22% | 20% | 33% | 22% | 18% | 18% | 23% | 26% | 31% | 27% | 16% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |
![]() | OK, what if the only two candidates in the runoff were Mike Aguirre and Kevin Faulconer? |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.4 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Aguirre | 35% | 37% | 33% | 46% | 35% | 30% | 28% | 40% | 29% | 31% | 37% | 42% | 41% | 52% | 31% | 37% | 36% | 19% | 37% | 18% | 44% | 35% | 26% | 36% | 43% | 30% | 46% | 30% | 44% | 40% | 28% |
Faulconer | 42% | 47% | 37% | 25% | 42% | 53% | 49% | 34% | 51% | 51% | 20% | 28% | 42% | 32% | 44% | 44% | 38% | 51% | 42% | 65% | 26% | 48% | 55% | 45% | 32% | 44% | 35% | 47% | 26% | 42% | 52% |
Undecided | 23% | 16% | 29% | 30% | 23% | 17% | 23% | 26% | 20% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 17% | 15% | 25% | 19% | 26% | 30% | 20% | 17% | 30% | 17% | 19% | 19% | 25% | 26% | 18% | 23% | 31% | 19% | 19% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |
![]() | OK, what if the only candidates were Mike Aguirre and David Alvarez? |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.4 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Aguirre | 32% | 36% | 29% | 36% | 31% | 35% | 26% | 33% | 31% | 35% | 31% | 22% | 41% | 46% | 29% | 31% | 28% | 24% | 39% | 34% | 29% | 36% | 34% | 31% | 34% | 31% | 41% | 28% | 34% | 36% | 30% |
Alvarez | 40% | 42% | 37% | 45% | 35% | 35% | 45% | 40% | 39% | 35% | 24% | 57% | 36% | 33% | 41% | 38% | 55% | 32% | 37% | 27% | 46% | 40% | 24% | 43% | 47% | 43% | 35% | 39% | 36% | 32% | 46% |
Undecided | 28% | 22% | 34% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 29% | 27% | 29% | 29% | 45% | 22% | 24% | 21% | 30% | 31% | 18% | 44% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 19% | 26% | 23% | 32% | 31% | 32% | 24% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |
![]() | And what if it were Kevin Faulconer and David Alvarez? |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.4 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Faulconer | 38% | 45% | 31% | 27% | 36% | 44% | 47% | 32% | 45% | 49% | 38% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 39% | 48% | 30% | 38% | 29% | 64% | 25% | 38% | 59% | 36% | 24% | 27% | 37% | 42% | 31% | 37% | 46% |
Alvarez | 35% | 34% | 37% | 49% | 34% | 29% | 29% | 41% | 29% | 26% | 16% | 66% | 31% | 43% | 34% | 32% | 49% | 21% | 46% | 15% | 46% | 36% | 17% | 37% | 49% | 45% | 41% | 28% | 36% | 33% | 34% |
Undecided | 26% | 21% | 32% | 24% | 30% | 28% | 24% | 27% | 26% | 25% | 46% | 21% | 35% | 23% | 27% | 20% | 22% | 42% | 25% | 21% | 29% | 26% | 24% | 27% | 27% | 28% | 23% | 30% | 34% | 30% | 20% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |
527 Likely Voters | All | Gender | Age | <50 / 50+ | Race | Cell Phone / Lan | Top Quality | Party Affiliation | Ideology | Education | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credibility Interval: ± 4.4 pct points | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | 18-49 | 50+ | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian / | Cell Pho | Landline | Integrit | Leadersh | Fiscal R | Reach Ac | Republic | Democrat | Independ | Conserva | Moderate | Liberal | High Sch | Some Col | 4-year C | < $40K | $40K - $ | > $80K | |
Integrity | 30% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 25% | 37% | 43% | 22% | 40% | 30% | 17% | 32% | 43% | 24% | 32% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 42% | 27% | 26% | 47% | 26% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 31% | 33% | 33% | 29% |
Leadership | 26% | 25% | 27% | 31% | 26% | 23% | 23% | 28% | 23% | 21% | 34% | 38% | 21% | 19% | 27% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 22% | 33% | 19% | 14% | 26% | 32% | 12% | 27% | 25% | 22% | 24% | 27% |
Stability | 6% | 8% | 4% | 11% | 7% | 4% | 1% | 9% | 3% | 6% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 13% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 5% | 11% | 3% | 4% | 13% | 8% | 7% | 5% | 6% | 10% | 3% |
Business Experience | 3% | 1% | 4% | 0% | 6% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 2% | 5% | 1% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 5% | 1% | 2% |
Fiscal Responsibility | 16% | 18% | 13% | 19% | 18% | 15% | 9% | 19% | 12% | 18% | 27% | 8% | 13% | 28% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 13% | 16% | 18% | 16% | 18% | 13% | 12% | 16% | 17% | 14% | 17% | 16% |
Reach Across Party Lines | 13% | 10% | 16% | 16% | 12% | 13% | 10% | 14% | 12% | 15% | 11% | 10% | 9% | 12% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 7% | 14% | 16% | 5% | 18% | 11% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 16% |
Something Else | 4% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 2% | 4% | 5% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 6% | 2% | 4% | 6% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 2% | 5% |
Not Sure | 3% | 4% | 2% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 8% | 2% | 4% | 3% | 1% | 3% | 5% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 0% | 5% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 3% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Composition of Likely Voters | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 52% | 48% | 58% | 8% | 24% | 9% | 20% | 80% | 30% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 25% | 47% | 27% | 26% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 35% | 56% | 24% | 33% | 43% |