Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #26798

¾ in Seattle Support Transportation Impact Fees on New Real Estate Development in City, Say More Should be Done to Fix Worst Bridges Now; Fixing Roads and Bridges, Supporting Buses and Other Public Transit Seen as Most Important Transportation Investments for Seattle to Make: SurveyUSA interviewed 1,000 Seattle adults on the city's transportation infrastructure and other issues. Key findings follow: Overall, a plurality of residents, 47%, say things in Seattle are headed in the right direction; 37% say things are off on the wrong track. Latinos (61%), parents of children under age 18 (60%), Democrats (57%), and men (55%) are more likely than others to say things are headed in the right direction; Republicans (53%) and independents (48%), and those not registered to vote (52%) are more likely than others to say things are off on the wrong track. Respondents were next asked to select up to three transportation investments they thought were most important for Seattle to make. Percentage selecting each of the six offered choices, from most-selected to least: 66%: Fixing potholes and repaving roads for all vehicles. Selected most in South Seattle (78%) and by older respondents (71% of 50 to 64 year-olds, 74% of those 65+). 64%: Supporting buses and other public transit. Selected by 95% of those who commute to work via light rail (caution, small sample size), 89% of those who walk to work, and 85% of of those who carpool (also a small sample size). 52%: Fixing Seattle's older bridges. More important to older respondents than younger respondents; chosen by 64% of those 65+, compared to 44% of 18 to 34 year-olds. 30%: Installing new sidewalks and crosswalks. 40% among those who walk to work, 39% among those who bike (small population); 38% among parents. 27%: Building bike lanes for safer streets. 61% among those who bike to work, unsurprisingly; significantly more popular among younger respondents (36% of 18 to 34 year-olds) than older (15% of those 50+). 17%: Prioritizing freight to transport food, household products, and other items. Significantly higher among the city's small number of Republican voters, 32% of whom select this item, than others. 6% say something else should be a top-priority; 1% say none of the above items should be priorities. 73% say the Mayor and the Seattle Department of Transportation should do more to fix Seattle's worst bridges this year; just 21% say they should wait until they have additional data on all bridges before doing so. Strong majorities of 61% of all demographic subgroups, excepting the 3% of Seattle adults who bicycle to work, say the city should do more to fix the bridges this year. 75% say they would support the city imposing transportation impact fees on new real estate development projects to help pay for the city's growing needs for transportation infrastructure, with 42% strongly supporting and 33% somewhat supporting the idea. 18% are opposed (8% somewhat oppose, 10% strongly oppose). Opposition is somewhat stronger among those with the lowest household incomes (25% of whom oppose), those over age 65 (23%), and among Latinos, among Asians, and in both South and West Seattle, where 22% each are opposed. After learning that some opponents of transportation impact fees say they would increase the cost of housing during a housing shortage, 55% continue to support (28% strongly, 27% somewhat), while opposition doubles to 36% (18% somewhat oppose, 18% strongly oppose.) The margin of support shrinks from 57 percentage points originally to 19 percentage points now, with the deepest cuts in support appearing among these populations: A 61-point fall among those with household incomes between $30k and $60k, from a 55-point margin of support to a 6-point margin of opposition. A 56-point fall among Republicans, from +55 to -1. A 50-point fall among those with incomes from $60k to $80k, from +67 to +17. A 48-point fall among Latinos, from +45 to -3. A 46-point fall among unemployed respondents, from +41 to -5. 45-point falls among both women (+56 to +11) and 18 to 34 year-olds (+58 to +13). After learning that some supporters of transportation impact fees say that without the fees, policy makers will likely increase property taxes and sales taxes to generate the same amount of revenue, 67% are in support, 27% in opposition – a 40-point margin of support, numbers closer to where they began, and opposition halfway between where it originally was and where it lies after respondents hear the reasoning of those opposed. Respondents are luke-warm on a proposal to allow real estate developers to build on 85% of their property, even if that may result in removal and eventual replacement of mature trees. 48% say the city's new proposal to protect trees should not allow this; 38% say it should. Support here is highest among parents (54%), in West Seattle (53%), among those who drive to work (48%), men (47%), and those with higher incomes. Opposition is highest among those who walk to work (79%), seniors (65%), those who are retired (62%), and among those of Latino or multiracial (each 60%), Asian (57%), or other (62%) heritage. 68% say the organizations that receive City tax dollars to provide low-income housing should be required to fill some of their available vacant units with people experiencing homelessness; 22% say they should not be required to do so. Majorities of nearly all groups, with the exception of the small number of light rail commuters, say the organizations should be required to fill some of their units with people experiencing homelessness. 59% of Seattle adults say Mayor Bruce Harrell should support City Attorney Ann Davison's proposal to make sure public drug use is against the law in Seattle; 28% say he should oppose that proposal. Opposition is highest, at 51% and 44% respectively, among the small numbers who bike or take light rail to work; at 42% among those who do not work outside their homes, at 35% among students, and at 34% among each of Democrats, 18 to 34 year-olds, and those who rent their homes. Support is as high as 78% among Republicans, 72% among parents and those who are retired, 71% in West Seattle, and 70% among seniors.

About the Research: SurveyUSA interviewed 1,000 adults from the city of Seattle 05/05/23 through 05/13/23. This research was conducted using blended sample, mixed mode. 50% of adults were online panelists chosen randomly by Lucid Holdings LLC of New Orleans, who were shown the survey questions on the display of their smartphone, laptop, or tablet. 50% of adults were interviewed by telephone by live operators, who dialed the respondents' numbers, secured their cooperation, and remained on the line to conduct the entire interview, using telephone sample of adults purchased from Aristotle in Washington DC. The pool of adult respondents was weighted to US Census targets for gender, age, race, and home ownership.

1	In general, do you think things in Seattle are headed in the right direction? Or are things off on the wrong track?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Right Direction	47%	55%	38%	51%	49%	37%	42%	50%	39%	49%	45%	61%	39%	44%	25%	48%	31%	40%	57%	36%	60%	42%	37%	37%	51%	52%	51%	51%	47%	36%	36%	50%	52%	45%	55%	70%	42%	40%	45%	45%	45%	52%	40%	49%	55%	39%	45%	48%
Wrong Track	37%	32%	42%	33%	37%	44%	38%	35%	42%	35%	39%	31%	39%	41%	55%	35%	52%	53%	29%	48%	28%	40%	36%	47%	39%	29%	36%	36%	31%	42%	44%	32%	34%	36%	33%	30%	39%	48%	48%	28%	38%	34%	37%	39%	31%	42%	40%	33%
Not Sure	16%	13%	20%	16%	14%	19%	20%	15%	20%	16%	16%	8%	22%	15%	19%	16%	18%	7%	15%	16%	12%	18%	27%	16%	11%	18%	13%	14%	21%	22%	20%	19%	14%	19%	12%	0%	20%	12%	7%	27%	17%	14%	23%	12%	14%	19%	14%	19%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

2	Thinking now about transportation in Seattle. Of the following, which three transportation investments do you think are the most important for Seattle to make? Prioritizing freight to transport food, household products, and other items?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 2.9 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	17%	19%	15%	19%	15%	15%	17%	17%	16%	18%	19%	19%	13%	15%	12%	16%	25%	32%	15%	18%	20%	15%	21%	17%	18%	16%	15%	13%	27%	21%	19%	20%	16%	18%	18%	0%	14%	19%	8%	5%	18%	15%	18%	17%	17%	17%	13%	21%
No	83%	81%	85%	81%	85%	85%	83%	83%	84%	82%	81%	81%	87%	85%	88%	84%	75%	68%	85%	82%	80%	85%	79%	83%	82%	84%	85%	87%	73%	79%	81%	80%	84%	82%	82%	100%	86%	81%	92%	95%	82%	85%	82%	83%	83%	83%	87%	79%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

3	Building bike lanes for safer streets?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.4 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	27%	28%	27%	36%	30%	15%	15%	34%	15%	28%	28%	32%	24%	33%	12%	27%	34%	26%	30%	27%	38%	24%	21%	30%	27%	31%	27%	32%	27%	26%	10%	31%	31%	31%	30%	26%	36%	15%	61%	24%	23%	35%	26%	27%	27%	28%	23%	32%
No	73%	72%	73%	64%	70%	85%	85%	66%	85%	72%	72%	68%	76%	67%	88%	73%	66%	74%	70%	73%	62%	76%	79%	70%	73%	69%	73%	68%	73%	74%	90%	69%	69%	69%	70%	74%	64%	85%	39%	76%	77%	65%	74%	73%	73%	72%	77%	68%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

4	Installing new sidewalks and crosswalks?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.5 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	30%	29%	32%	31%	36%	26%	26%	33%	26%	29%	33%	36%	34%	28%	31%	30%	31%	34%	32%	27%	38%	27%	27%	28%	26%	32%	35%	33%	25%	32%	24%	26%	31%	33%	32%	21%	25%	19%	39%	40%	30%	30%	28%	34%	33%	28%	26%	35%
No	70%	71%	68%	69%	64%	74%	74%	67%	74%	71%	67%	64%	66%	72%	69%	70%	69%	66%	68%	73%	62%	73%	73%	72%	74%	68%	65%	67%	75%	68%	76%	74%	69%	67%	68%	79%	75%	81%	61%	60%	70%	70%	72%	66%	67%	72%	74%	65%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

5	Supporting buses and other public transit?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.7 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	64%	60%	68%	69%	63%	61%	55%	66%	59%	66%	53%	57%	64%	73%	48%	66%	47%	49%	69%	63%	55%	68%	60%	63%	66%	67%	63%	68%	55%	61%	54%	69%	65%	73%	57%	85%	74%	95%	67%	89%	69%	69%	52%	56%	57%	69%	62%	65%
No	36%	40%	32%	31%	37%	39%	45%	34%	41%	34%	47%	43%	36%	27%	52%	34%	53%	51%	31%	37%	45%	32%	40%	37%	34%	33%	37%	32%	45%	39%	46%	31%	35%	27%	43%	15%	26%	5%	33%	11%	31%	31%	48%	44%	43%	31%	38%	35%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

6	Fixing potholes and repaving roads for all vehicles?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.6 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	66%	67%	66%	66%	59%	71%	74%	63%	72%	66%	54%	60%	73%	72%	72%	67%	66%	61%	63%	70%	58%	70%	71%	73%	64%	65%	61%	64%	66%	63%	71%	79%	65%	63%	68%	40%	61%	65%	48%	69%	64%	61%	78%	67%	64%	68%	68%	64%
No	34%	33%	34%	34%	41%	29%	26%	37%	28%	34%	46%	40%	27%	28%	28%	33%	34%	39%	37%	30%	42%	30%	29%	27%	36%	35%	39%	36%	34%	37%	29%	21%	35%	37%	32%	60%	39%	35%	52%	31%	36%	39%	22%	33%	36%	32%	32%	36%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

7	Fixing Seattle's older bridges?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	52%	54%	50%	44%	52%	60%	64%	47%	61%	55%	50%	51%	45%	46%	42%	54%	36%	44%	57%	49%	53%	52%	50%	44%	49%	57%	55%	53%	38%	55%	63%	33%	50%	54%	51%	66%	47%	51%	42%	45%	52%	53%	47%	56%	58%	47%	56%	48%
No	48%	46%	50%	56%	48%	40%	36%	53%	39%	45%	50%	49%	55%	54%	58%	46%	64%	56%	43%	51%	47%	48%	50%	56%	51%	43%	45%	47%	62%	45%	37%	67%	50%	46%	49%	34%	53%	49%	58%	55%	48%	47%	53%	44%	42%	53%	44%	52%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

8	Something else?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 1.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	6%	5%	6%	3%	6%	11%	5%	4%	8%	5%	9%	0%	6%	8%	11%	5%	9%	9%	5%	7%	3%	7%	6%	4%	7%	4%	7%	5%	9%	4%	7%	0%	6%	4%	7%	6%	7%	0%	3%	3%	5%	8%	5%	5%	6%	5%	7%	4%
No	94%	95%	94%	97%	94%	89%	95%	96%	92%	95%	91%	100%	94%	92%	89%	95%	91%	91%	95%	93%	97%	93%	94%	96%	93%	96%	93%	95%	91%	96%	93%	100%	94%	96%	93%	94%	93%	100%	97%	97%	95%	92%	95%	95%	94%	95%	93%	96%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

9	None of the above?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 0.7 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	1%	0%	1%	1%	0%	2%	0%	0%	1%	1%	4%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	2%	1%	0%	1%	1%	1%	2%	1%	0%	0%	1%	1%	0%	4%	1%	0%	1%	0%	1%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	1%	0%	1%	1%	1%	1%	0%	1%
No	99%	100%	99%	99%	100%	98%	100%	100%	99%	99%	96%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	98%	99%	100%	99%	99%	99%	98%	99%	100%	100%	99%	99%	100%	96%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	99%	99%	99%	100%	99%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

10

After the West Seattle Bridge cracked and closed, the city ordered an audit of all Seattle bridges, which found several bridges in poor condition. Do you think the Mayor and the Seattle Department of Transportation should do more to fix Seattle's worst bridges this year or should they wait until they have additional data on all bridges?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.4 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Do More To Fix	73%	73%	72%	69%	76%	79%	72%	71%	76%	73%	72%	77%	66%	80%	74%	72%	81%	73%	75%	71%	74%	72%	72%	75%	72%	71%	74%	73%	76%	65%	76%	68%	73%	79%	74%	61%	73%	77%	45%	71%	68%	76%	74%	77%	75%	71%	67%	79%
Wait For Additional Data	21%	21%	20%	25%	18%	16%	20%	22%	18%	20%	25%	21%	29%	9%	22%	22%	11%	21%	19%	23%	23%	20%	21%	21%	21%	23%	19%	21%	23%	25%	15%	23%	22%	16%	21%	39%	22%	16%	31%	27%	23%	17%	22%	19%	19%	23%	25%	16%
Not Sure	6%	6%	7%	7%	6%	5%	9%	6%	7%	7%	3%	2%	5%	12%	5%	6%	8%	6%	6%	6%	2%	8%	7%	4%	8%	7%	6%	6%	1%	10%	9%	9%	5%	5%	5%	0%	5%	6%	24%	2%	8%	7%	4%	5%	7%	6%	8%	5%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

11

Seattle may consider imposing fees on new real estate development projects to help pay for the city's growing needs for transportation infrastructure. (For example, a real estate developer may have to pay $8,000 to the City government on a condominium project the developer hopes to sell for $800,000.) Would you support or oppose these transportation impact fees on new real estate developments to help pay for transportation infrastructure?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Strongly Support	42%	43%	41%	36%	50%	47%	41%	41%	44%	45%	50%	32%	33%	38%	38%	44%	30%	30%	49%	39%	41%	43%	34%	33%	51%	44%	46%	49%	37%	26%	40%	15%	47%	48%	45%	61%	52%	71%	44%	43%	42%	45%	39%	41%	45%	40%	46%	39%
Somewhat Support	33%	34%	31%	38%	31%	28%	28%	35%	28%	33%	29%	35%	34%	35%	19%	33%	32%	45%	34%	28%	38%	30%	31%	38%	30%	33%	32%	31%	40%	35%	31%	28%	33%	35%	33%	5%	36%	29%	37%	32%	30%	37%	34%	31%	34%	31%	27%	38%
Somewhat Oppose	8%	7%	8%	9%	6%	8%	7%	8%	7%	6%	6%	7%	14%	13%	7%	8%	10%	7%	6%	7%	5%	9%	11%	6%	6%	9%	8%	7%	9%	10%	6%	20%	7%	7%	6%	22%	1%	0%	16%	10%	8%	7%	9%	7%	5%	10%	7%	9%
Strongly Oppose	10%	12%	8%	7%	10%	12%	16%	8%	14%	10%	11%	15%	8%	4%	27%	10%	12%	13%	6%	15%	14%	9%	14%	10%	8%	8%	12%	9%	12%	10%	14%	11%	11%	5%	13%	12%	5%	0%	0%	9%	11%	5%	13%	15%	11%	10%	14%	7%
Not Sure	7%	3%	11%	10%	4%	5%	8%	7%	7%	6%	3%	11%	11%	9%	8%	6%	16%	5%	5%	11%	3%	9%	11%	13%	5%	6%	3%	4%	1%	19%	9%	26%	3%	6%	2%	0%	6%	0%	3%	6%	9%	7%	4%	6%	5%	9%	6%	8%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

12	Some opponents of transportation impact fees say they would increase the cost of housing during a housing shortage. Based on this, would you support or oppose these transportation impact fees on new real estate developments?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Strongly Support	28%	32%	24%	20%	34%	35%	33%	26%	34%	31%	30%	25%	19%	27%	23%	30%	18%	17%	34%	25%	29%	28%	22%	20%	28%	33%	34%	32%	21%	20%	33%	6%	29%	37%	29%	9%	27%	63%	16%	32%	29%	25%	27%	34%	35%	23%	37%	20%
Somewhat Support	27%	29%	25%	33%	28%	21%	19%	31%	20%	28%	28%	19%	30%	31%	14%	28%	27%	32%	31%	23%	35%	24%	23%	22%	27%	31%	31%	30%	34%	18%	19%	26%	32%	27%	30%	58%	40%	21%	44%	24%	21%	36%	27%	28%	29%	26%	23%	32%
Somewhat Oppose	18%	14%	21%	23%	13%	12%	17%	19%	14%	16%	14%	16%	29%	11%	14%	17%	25%	31%	16%	16%	14%	19%	23%	27%	14%	13%	14%	15%	22%	24%	13%	34%	16%	16%	16%	22%	9%	7%	28%	18%	18%	17%	20%	13%	12%	22%	12%	23%
Strongly Oppose	18%	19%	17%	17%	17%	21%	20%	17%	20%	17%	20%	31%	13%	12%	31%	18%	17%	19%	12%	28%	16%	19%	16%	21%	24%	16%	15%	17%	15%	19%	24%	22%	17%	15%	19%	12%	12%	0%	3%	18%	22%	13%	15%	20%	16%	20%	20%	16%
Not Sure	9%	5%	12%	7%	8%	11%	11%	8%	11%	7%	8%	9%	9%	20%	17%	8%	14%	2%	7%	8%	6%	10%	16%	10%	7%	6%	7%	6%	9%	20%	10%	11%	7%	4%	7%	0%	11%	8%	10%	8%	9%	8%	11%	5%	7%	10%	9%	9%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

13	Some supporters of transportation impact fees say that without the fees, policy makers will likely increase property taxes and sales taxes to generate the same amount of revenue. Based on this, would you support or oppose these transportation impact fees on new real estate developments?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Strongly Support	34%	36%	33%	31%	39%	40%	30%	34%	36%	37%	39%	23%	32%	32%	21%	37%	19%	21%	40%	30%	30%	36%	24%	26%	41%	37%	39%	41%	27%	24%	30%	7%	37%	48%	35%	31%	46%	49%	24%	45%	33%	37%	32%	35%	36%	33%	38%	31%
Somewhat Support	33%	34%	32%	38%	33%	26%	26%	36%	26%	35%	28%	28%	34%	34%	20%	33%	36%	40%	36%	30%	39%	31%	32%	37%	30%	29%	36%	34%	33%	28%	27%	40%	35%	34%	36%	12%	33%	33%	53%	27%	30%	37%	33%	32%	35%	31%	27%	38%
Somewhat Oppose	12%	9%	15%	13%	12%	9%	14%	13%	11%	11%	18%	17%	16%	7%	9%	11%	16%	15%	10%	13%	12%	12%	17%	16%	7%	12%	10%	8%	23%	20%	11%	22%	11%	5%	12%	22%	6%	0%	16%	9%	11%	12%	15%	11%	9%	14%	10%	14%
Strongly Oppose	15%	18%	13%	13%	13%	21%	21%	13%	21%	13%	14%	26%	13%	18%	40%	14%	24%	22%	9%	23%	15%	16%	17%	17%	15%	16%	13%	13%	15%	15%	23%	22%	13%	13%	13%	17%	12%	18%	0%	20%	19%	9%	16%	17%	16%	15%	19%	12%
Not Sure	5%	4%	7%	5%	4%	5%	9%	5%	6%	5%	1%	7%	5%	9%	11%	5%	4%	3%	4%	5%	2%	6%	9%	5%	6%	5%	2%	4%	2%	13%	8%	9%	4%	0%	4%	18%	2%	0%	7%	0%	6%	4%	4%	5%	3%	7%	5%	5%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

14	Should the City of Seattle's new proposal to protect trees allow real estate developers to build on 85% of the property, even if that may result in removal and eventual replacement of mature trees?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Yes	38%	47%	29%	40%	44%	33%	28%	42%	31%	43%	39%	34%	28%	32%	21%	39%	28%	39%	40%	37%	54%	31%	33%	28%	30%	47%	46%	41%	41%	30%	28%	37%	41%	39%	48%	12%	33%	23%	54%	16%	36%	35%	33%	53%	44%	33%	37%	39%
No	48%	43%	54%	42%	46%	53%	65%	43%	58%	43%	50%	60%	57%	60%	62%	48%	50%	47%	48%	50%	37%	54%	50%	61%	58%	41%	40%	45%	47%	49%	62%	45%	47%	41%	42%	83%	50%	50%	21%	79%	48%	53%	57%	33%	44%	52%	54%	43%
Not Sure	14%	10%	18%	18%	10%	14%	7%	15%	11%	15%	10%	5%	15%	8%	17%	13%	22%	14%	12%	13%	8%	15%	18%	11%	12%	12%	15%	13%	12%	20%	9%	18%	12%	19%	10%	5%	18%	26%	25%	5%	17%	11%	10%	14%	12%	15%	9%	18%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

15	Should the organizations that receive City tax dollars to provide low-income housing be required to fill some of their available vacant units with people experiencing homelessness?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.6 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Should Be Required	68%	66%	70%	69%	74%	58%	68%	71%	62%	70%	83%	67%	59%	64%	55%	69%	59%	57%	76%	58%	77%	65%	70%	66%	67%	69%	68%	67%	71%	70%	64%	70%	70%	58%	68%	79%	76%	49%	72%	79%	64%	74%	68%	67%	72%	65%	62%	74%
Should Not Be Required	22%	28%	16%	22%	19%	29%	22%	21%	26%	21%	16%	25%	29%	19%	31%	21%	28%	35%	16%	32%	20%	23%	16%	27%	22%	18%	26%	24%	20%	14%	26%	19%	21%	30%	25%	13%	16%	31%	11%	7%	25%	18%	21%	24%	21%	24%	28%	16%
Not Sure	10%	5%	14%	9%	7%	14%	11%	8%	12%	9%	2%	8%	12%	18%	14%	9%	14%	8%	8%	11%	4%	12%	13%	7%	11%	13%	6%	9%	9%	15%	10%	11%	8%	12%	7%	9%	8%	20%	17%	14%	11%	7%	10%	10%	7%	12%	10%	10%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

16	Should Mayor Bruce Harrell support or oppose City Attorney Ann Davison's proposal to make sure public drug use is against the law in Seattle?

1000 Adults	All	Gender		Age				<50 / 50+		Race						Registered		Party Affiliation			Parent		Income					Employment Status					Work Outside Hom		Commute						Neighborhood				Home		Type Of Intervie
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Male	Female	18-34	35-49	50-64	65+	18-49	50+	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian	Multirac	Other	Yes	No	Republic	Democrat	Independ	Yes	No	< $30K	$30K - $	$60K - $	$80K - $	> $120K	Full-tim	Part-tim	Not Empl	Retired	Student	Yes	No	Car	Carpool	Bus	Light Ra	Bicycle	Walk	North Se	Central	South Se	West Sea	Own	Rent	Live Cal	Internet
Support	59%	61%	56%	52%	60%	64%	70%	55%	66%	59%	61%	53%	64%	50%	60%	58%	64%	78%	54%	63%	72%	53%	51%	63%	51%	65%	60%	59%	54%	45%	72%	53%	60%	46%	64%	66%	51%	47%	35%	64%	55%	59%	55%	71%	69%	50%	55%	62%
Oppose	28%	27%	29%	34%	29%	22%	17%	32%	20%	30%	31%	26%	24%	25%	16%	29%	22%	17%	34%	22%	21%	31%	28%	28%	30%	24%	30%	30%	31%	32%	13%	35%	28%	42%	27%	18%	32%	44%	51%	20%	30%	29%	28%	20%	22%	34%	33%	23%
Not Sure	13%	11%	15%	14%	11%	14%	13%	13%	14%	11%	8%	21%	12%	25%	24%	13%	14%	6%	12%	15%	7%	16%	21%	9%	20%	11%	10%	11%	15%	23%	15%	12%	11%	13%	10%	16%	16%	9%	14%	15%	14%	12%	17%	9%	10%	16%	12%	14%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	51%	49%	41%	26%	19%	14%	67%	33%	62%	7%	7%	13%	6%	4%	89%	9%	7%	57%	27%	29%	68%	15%	18%	17%	22%	27%	58%	12%	9%	15%	6%	81%	17%	67%	3%	14%	3%	3%	9%	38%	27%	18%	17%	46%	54%	50%	50%

All Questions Crosstabbed By All Questions

1	In general, do you think things in Seattle are headed in the right direction? Or are things off on the wrong track?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Right Direction	47%	-	-	-	51%	46%	56%	43%	47%	47%	50%	41%	43%	55%	48%	45%	27%	48%	30%	47%	46%	50%	41%	53%	50%	36%	27%	31%	54%	54%	48%	34%	25%	51%	51%	54%	32%	22%	57%	42%	36%	53%	33%	34%	45%	51%	45%
Wrong Track	37%	-	-	-	38%	37%	30%	40%	36%	37%	33%	43%	40%	31%	36%	38%	54%	36%	44%	37%	38%	34%	35%	33%	30%	52%	64%	35%	33%	30%	37%	56%	33%	34%	33%	28%	56%	45%	33%	40%	39%	32%	54%	36%	42%	31%	26%
Not Sure	16%	-	-	-	10%	18%	14%	17%	17%	16%	17%	16%	17%	15%	16%	17%	19%	16%	26%	16%	16%	16%	24%	14%	19%	12%	9%	34%	13%	17%	16%	10%	41%	15%	17%	19%	12%	33%	10%	19%	25%	16%	13%	30%	13%	17%	29%
Total	100%				100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%				17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

2	Thinking now about transportation in Seattle. Of the following, which three transportation investments do you think are the most important for Seattle to make? Prioritizing freight to transport food, household products, and other items?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 2.9 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	17%	19%	17%	11%	-	-	10%	20%	11%	20%	12%	26%	16%	19%	11%	23%	12%	17%	0%	17%	17%	19%	10%	15%	21%	11%	21%	11%	13%	17%	16%	29%	7%	13%	21%	15%	23%	8%	21%	15%	13%	16%	23%	12%	18%	13%	19%
No	83%	81%	83%	89%	-	-	90%	80%	89%	80%	88%	74%	84%	81%	89%	77%	88%	83%	100%	83%	83%	81%	90%	85%	79%	89%	79%	89%	87%	83%	84%	71%	93%	87%	79%	85%	77%	92%	79%	85%	87%	84%	77%	88%	82%	87%	81%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%			27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

3	Building bike lanes for safer streets?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.4 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	27%	33%	22%	24%	16%	30%	-	-	25%	28%	28%	26%	19%	44%	21%	35%	8%	29%	0%	28%	28%	28%	24%	32%	29%	22%	12%	19%	28%	37%	32%	16%	12%	29%	30%	35%	15%	16%	32%	25%	22%	31%	21%	16%	26%	35%	19%
No	73%	67%	78%	76%	84%	70%	-	-	75%	72%	72%	74%	81%	56%	79%	65%	92%	71%	100%	72%	72%	72%	76%	68%	71%	78%	88%	81%	72%	63%	68%	84%	88%	71%	70%	65%	85%	84%	68%	75%	78%	69%	79%	84%	74%	65%	81%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%			30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

4	Installing new sidewalks and crosswalks?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.5 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	30%	30%	30%	32%	19%	33%	28%	31%	-	-	27%	36%	26%	39%	21%	40%	10%	32%	0%	31%	29%	38%	17%	30%	29%	37%	30%	33%	30%	28%	30%	34%	35%	31%	31%	32%	32%	17%	31%	29%	33%	32%	25%	32%	32%	32%	18%
No	70%	70%	70%	68%	81%	67%	72%	69%	-	-	73%	64%	74%	61%	79%	60%	90%	68%	100%	69%	71%	62%	83%	70%	71%	63%	70%	67%	70%	72%	70%	66%	65%	69%	69%	68%	68%	83%	69%	71%	67%	68%	75%	68%	68%	68%	82%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%			64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

5	Supporting buses and other public transit?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.7 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	64%	68%	58%	65%	45%	68%	66%	63%	57%	67%	-	-	58%	75%	60%	67%	36%	65%	0%	64%	64%	64%	62%	72%	62%	53%	35%	75%	71%	61%	68%	55%	62%	72%	66%	58%	48%	64%	57%	69%	67%	69%	48%	66%	56%	80%	66%
No	36%	32%	42%	35%	55%	32%	34%	37%	43%	33%	-	-	42%	25%	40%	33%	64%	35%	100%	36%	36%	36%	38%	28%	38%	47%	65%	25%	29%	39%	32%	45%	38%	28%	34%	42%	52%	36%	43%	31%	33%	31%	52%	34%	44%	20%	34%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%			66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

6	Fixing potholes and repaving roads for all vehicles?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.6 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	66%	60%	72%	70%	62%	67%	46%	74%	57%	70%	60%	77%	-	-	69%	63%	40%	68%	0%	67%	67%	67%	49%	61%	68%	71%	75%	69%	61%	65%	68%	71%	73%	65%	64%	67%	73%	67%	64%	67%	68%	61%	76%	77%	70%	59%	62%
No	34%	40%	28%	30%	38%	33%	54%	26%	43%	30%	40%	23%	-	-	31%	37%	60%	32%	100%	33%	33%	33%	51%	39%	32%	29%	25%	31%	39%	35%	32%	29%	27%	35%	36%	33%	27%	33%	36%	33%	32%	39%	24%	23%	30%	41%	38%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%			52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

7	Fixing Seattle's older bridges?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	52%	54%	51%	49%	33%	56%	40%	57%	36%	59%	49%	57%	54%	47%	-	-	37%	53%	0%	52%	56%	39%	46%	53%	54%	42%	54%	42%	60%	51%	47%	46%	47%	57%	53%	41%	48%	45%	54%	52%	47%	52%	54%	49%	55%	46%	51%
No	48%	46%	49%	51%	67%	44%	60%	43%	64%	41%	51%	43%	46%	53%	-	-	63%	47%	100%	48%	44%	61%	54%	47%	46%	58%	46%	58%	40%	49%	53%	54%	53%	43%	47%	59%	52%	55%	46%	48%	53%	48%	46%	51%	45%	54%	49%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%			6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

8	Something else?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 1.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	6%	3%	8%	7%	4%	6%	2%	7%	2%	7%	3%	10%	3%	10%	4%	7%	-	-	0%	6%	6%	6%	7%	6%	3%	11%	9%	6%	5%	6%	2%	7%	8%	5%	5%	5%	10%	5%	4%	7%	4%	5%	10%	4%	6%	4%	8%
No	94%	97%	92%	93%	96%	94%	98%	93%	98%	93%	97%	90%	97%	90%	96%	93%	-	-	100%	94%	94%	94%	93%	94%	97%	89%	91%	94%	95%	94%	98%	93%	92%	95%	95%	95%	90%	95%	96%	93%	96%	95%	90%	96%	94%	96%	92%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%			1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

9	None of the above?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 0.7 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	1%	0%	1%	1%	0%	1%	0%	1%	0%	1%	0%	2%	0%	2%	0%	2%	0%	1%	-	-	1%	0%	4%	0%	1%	0%	2%	3%	0%	1%	0%	1%	3%	0%	1%	1%	1%	5%	1%	0%	2%	0%	1%	1%	0%	1%	2%
No	99%	100%	99%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	98%	100%	98%	100%	98%	100%	99%	-	-	99%	100%	96%	100%	99%	100%	98%	97%	100%	99%	100%	99%	97%	100%	99%	99%	99%	95%	99%	100%	98%	100%	99%	99%	100%	99%	98%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%			100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%			73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

10

After the West Seattle Bridge cracked and closed, the city ordered an audit of all Seattle bridges, which found several bridges in poor condition. Do you think the Mayor and the Seattle Department of Transportation should do more to fix Seattle's worst bridges this year or should they wait until they have additional data on all bridges?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.4 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Do More To Fix	73%	72%	75%	70%	73%	73%	74%	73%	70%	74%	73%	72%	74%	70%	79%	67%	70%	73%	52%	73%	-	-	-	75%	72%	59%	81%	67%	72%	75%	71%	76%	63%	74%	74%	69%	78%	49%	73%	76%	61%	75%	71%	62%	77%	70%	62%
Wait For Additional Data	21%	22%	19%	20%	23%	20%	21%	21%	26%	18%	21%	21%	21%	20%	16%	26%	22%	21%	10%	21%	-	-	-	20%	23%	30%	13%	15%	21%	21%	26%	17%	15%	21%	19%	28%	17%	22%	23%	18%	21%	20%	25%	16%	20%	22%	23%
Not Sure	6%	6%	6%	10%	4%	7%	6%	7%	4%	8%	6%	7%	5%	10%	6%	7%	8%	6%	38%	6%	-	-	-	5%	5%	10%	6%	18%	6%	3%	3%	8%	21%	5%	6%	3%	5%	29%	3%	6%	18%	5%	4%	22%	4%	8%	16%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%				100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%				42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

11

Seattle may consider imposing fees on new real estate development projects to help pay for the city's growing needs for transportation infrastructure. (For example, a real estate developer may have to pay $8,000 to the City government on a condominium project the developer hopes to sell for $800,000.) Would you support or oppose these transportation impact fees on new real estate developments to help pay for transportation infrastructure?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Strongly Support	42%	48%	37%	36%	38%	43%	50%	39%	42%	42%	48%	32%	39%	48%	43%	41%	44%	42%	7%	42%	44%	41%	31%	-	-	-	-	-	82%	32%	22%	23%	25%	80%	26%	22%	18%	17%	42%	45%	33%	48%	30%	32%	40%	49%	36%
Somewhat Support	33%	35%	27%	39%	40%	31%	35%	32%	31%	33%	32%	34%	34%	31%	34%	31%	17%	34%	30%	33%	32%	36%	26%	-	-	-	-	-	15%	60%	38%	17%	28%	16%	58%	42%	13%	18%	34%	32%	33%	34%	32%	23%	33%	34%	27%
Somewhat Oppose	8%	6%	11%	6%	5%	8%	6%	8%	10%	7%	6%	10%	8%	7%	6%	9%	15%	7%	0%	8%	6%	11%	13%	-	-	-	-	-	2%	4%	23%	10%	4%	2%	9%	22%	6%	11%	9%	7%	8%	6%	14%	8%	8%	7%	8%
Strongly Oppose	10%	6%	18%	5%	13%	10%	4%	13%	10%	10%	6%	19%	12%	8%	11%	10%	16%	10%	31%	10%	11%	6%	10%	-	-	-	-	-	1%	2%	5%	42%	12%	1%	2%	8%	51%	8%	13%	8%	11%	7%	20%	11%	13%	4%	10%
Not Sure	7%	5%	7%	15%	5%	8%	5%	8%	8%	7%	8%	5%	7%	6%	6%	9%	8%	7%	33%	7%	6%	5%	20%	-	-	-	-	-	0%	2%	12%	9%	31%	1%	5%	6%	12%	46%	3%	8%	16%	5%	4%	26%	5%	6%	19%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%						100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%						28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

12	Some opponents of transportation impact fees say they would increase the cost of housing during a housing shortage. Based on this, would you support or oppose these transportation impact fees on new real estate developments?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Strongly Support	28%	33%	25%	23%	22%	30%	29%	28%	28%	29%	32%	23%	26%	33%	33%	23%	27%	29%	0%	29%	28%	29%	29%	55%	13%	6%	4%	1%	-	-	-	-	-	62%	15%	8%	6%	3%	32%	28%	20%	30%	27%	24%	28%	31%	28%
Somewhat Support	27%	31%	22%	28%	27%	27%	36%	24%	25%	28%	26%	30%	27%	29%	27%	28%	31%	27%	27%	27%	28%	28%	13%	21%	50%	16%	4%	7%	-	-	-	-	-	19%	47%	24%	10%	12%	31%	26%	22%	30%	23%	18%	28%	27%	21%
Somewhat Oppose	18%	18%	17%	17%	17%	18%	21%	16%	17%	18%	19%	15%	18%	17%	16%	19%	7%	18%	10%	18%	17%	22%	8%	9%	20%	51%	9%	31%	-	-	-	-	-	10%	24%	42%	7%	7%	16%	18%	22%	18%	19%	10%	18%	18%	14%
Strongly Oppose	18%	13%	27%	11%	31%	16%	11%	21%	20%	17%	15%	23%	20%	15%	16%	20%	23%	18%	31%	18%	19%	14%	22%	10%	9%	23%	73%	23%	-	-	-	-	-	5%	8%	20%	67%	17%	16%	19%	19%	16%	28%	14%	21%	13%	17%
Not Sure	9%	5%	8%	22%	3%	10%	4%	11%	10%	8%	8%	9%	10%	7%	8%	10%	12%	8%	33%	9%	8%	6%	29%	5%	7%	4%	10%	39%	-	-	-	-	-	4%	5%	6%	10%	61%	6%	8%	19%	7%	3%	35%	5%	10%	21%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%						100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%						34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

13	Some supporters of transportation impact fees say that without the fees, policy makers will likely increase property taxes and sales taxes to generate the same amount of revenue. Based on this, would you support or oppose these transportation impact fees on new real estate developments?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Strongly Support	34%	37%	32%	31%	26%	36%	37%	34%	35%	34%	39%	27%	34%	36%	38%	30%	31%	35%	0%	35%	35%	35%	28%	65%	17%	9%	4%	6%	75%	24%	19%	9%	18%	-	-	-	-	-	33%	38%	27%	36%	32%	27%	33%	39%	34%
Somewhat Support	33%	36%	29%	33%	40%	31%	36%	32%	33%	33%	34%	31%	32%	35%	33%	32%	29%	33%	27%	33%	34%	31%	32%	20%	59%	37%	7%	23%	18%	57%	44%	15%	20%	-	-	-	-	-	40%	28%	32%	35%	27%	29%	34%	35%	25%
Somewhat Oppose	12%	14%	9%	14%	10%	12%	16%	11%	13%	12%	11%	14%	12%	12%	10%	15%	10%	12%	10%	12%	11%	16%	5%	6%	16%	34%	9%	10%	4%	11%	29%	13%	9%	-	-	-	-	-	12%	12%	11%	12%	13%	9%	12%	12%	10%
Strongly Oppose	15%	11%	24%	11%	21%	14%	9%	18%	16%	15%	12%	22%	17%	13%	14%	17%	26%	15%	31%	15%	17%	12%	12%	6%	6%	12%	76%	27%	3%	6%	6%	57%	18%	-	-	-	-	-	12%	17%	20%	12%	26%	14%	19%	10%	12%
Not Sure	5%	2%	6%	10%	2%	6%	3%	6%	3%	6%	5%	5%	5%	5%	4%	6%	4%	5%	33%	5%	3%	5%	23%	2%	3%	7%	4%	34%	1%	2%	2%	5%	36%	-	-	-	-	-	3%	6%	10%	4%	2%	21%	2%	4%	19%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%						100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%						38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

14	Should the City of Seattle's new proposal to protect trees allow real estate developers to build on 85% of the property, even if that may result in removal and eventual replacement of mature trees?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Yes	38%	47%	34%	24%	48%	36%	44%	36%	39%	38%	34%	46%	37%	40%	39%	37%	29%	39%	48%	38%	38%	43%	20%	38%	40%	44%	47%	15%	42%	43%	34%	35%	25%	36%	46%	39%	29%	22%	-	-	-	38%	46%	17%	43%	36%	22%
No	48%	43%	52%	55%	42%	50%	45%	50%	46%	49%	52%	42%	49%	47%	48%	48%	61%	48%	21%	49%	50%	43%	42%	52%	47%	42%	40%	55%	48%	46%	49%	51%	47%	53%	41%	48%	53%	53%	-	-	-	51%	41%	49%	47%	49%	54%
Not Sure	14%	10%	14%	21%	10%	14%	11%	14%	15%	13%	14%	12%	14%	13%	12%	15%	10%	14%	31%	13%	11%	14%	37%	10%	14%	13%	14%	30%	9%	11%	17%	14%	29%	11%	13%	12%	18%	26%	-	-	-	11%	13%	34%	10%	16%	24%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%				100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%				68%	22%	10%	59%	28%	13%

15	Should the organizations that receive City tax dollars to provide low-income housing be required to fill some of their available vacant units with people experiencing homelessness?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.6 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Should Be Required	68%	77%	58%	65%	63%	69%	77%	65%	72%	66%	73%	59%	63%	77%	68%	68%	56%	69%	42%	68%	70%	66%	53%	77%	71%	50%	46%	53%	71%	75%	70%	58%	53%	72%	73%	70%	54%	50%	69%	71%	55%	-	-	-	68%	73%	56%
Should Not Be Required	22%	16%	33%	17%	30%	21%	17%	24%	18%	24%	17%	32%	26%	16%	23%	21%	37%	21%	41%	22%	22%	27%	13%	16%	22%	40%	44%	12%	21%	19%	25%	34%	8%	20%	19%	23%	38%	10%	27%	19%	21%	-	-	-	24%	21%	18%
Not Sure	10%	7%	9%	18%	7%	10%	6%	11%	10%	9%	10%	9%	11%	7%	9%	10%	7%	10%	17%	10%	8%	7%	34%	7%	7%	10%	11%	35%	8%	6%	5%	7%	39%	8%	9%	7%	9%	40%	4%	10%	24%	-	-	-	7%	7%	26%
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%				100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%				59%	28%	13%

16	Should Mayor Bruce Harrell support or oppose City Attorney Ann Davison's proposal to make sure public drug use is against the law in Seattle?

1000 Adults	All	Seattle Direction			Prioritizing Fre		Bike Lanes		New Sidewalks		Supporting Buses		Fixing Potholes		Fixing Older Bri		Other		None Above		Bridges			Fees					Based On Opponents					Based On Supporters					Allow To Build			Fill With Homeless			Davison Proposal
Credibility Interval: ± 3.8 pct points		Right Di	Wrong Tr	Not Sure	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Do More	Wait For	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Strongly	Somewhat	Somewhat	Strongly	Not Sure	Yes	No	Not Sure	Should B	Should N	Not Sure	Support	Oppose	Not Sure
Support	59%	56%	67%	48%	64%	58%	55%	60%	63%	57%	51%	72%	63%	51%	62%	55%	63%	59%	32%	59%	62%	56%	33%	56%	60%	62%	75%	42%	57%	61%	60%	68%	35%	56%	60%	60%	71%	27%	66%	57%	44%	59%	64%	45%	-	-	-
Oppose	28%	31%	24%	29%	21%	29%	36%	25%	30%	27%	35%	16%	25%	34%	25%	31%	18%	29%	26%	28%	27%	30%	35%	33%	29%	25%	12%	23%	30%	28%	29%	20%	33%	31%	29%	29%	18%	24%	26%	28%	32%	30%	26%	20%	-	-	-
Not Sure	13%	13%	9%	23%	15%	13%	9%	15%	8%	16%	14%	12%	13%	15%	13%	14%	19%	13%	42%	13%	11%	15%	32%	11%	11%	13%	13%	36%	13%	10%	10%	12%	31%	13%	10%	11%	11%	49%	7%	15%	24%	11%	11%	36%	-	-	-
Total	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Composition of Adults	100%	47%	37%	16%	17%	83%	27%	73%	30%	70%	64%	36%	66%	34%	52%	48%	6%	94%	1%	99%	73%	21%	6%	42%	33%	8%	10%	7%	28%	27%	18%	18%	9%	34%	33%	12%	15%	5%	38%	48%	14%	68%	22%	10%